Study Room Reservation System

 
Study rooms are available at ERAU for students to reserve 24/7

Study rooms are available at ERAU for students to reserve 24/7

METHODS:

Interview / Observation

Cognitive walk-through

Task Analysis

SHERPA Error Analysis

Keystroke Level Model (KLM)

Cost-Benefit Analysis

NASA - TLX

The Problem

At the time of this study, I was working in the ERAU Student Union as the Overnight Lead, directly responsible for the building and a 10-person team in a new $75 million building. During this time, it was clear that the existing study room reservation system was not performing efficiently. Over 40% of requests were being denied, and there was an endless barrage of complaints from students and staff about confusion and frustration in the process.

 

Step 1 - Observation

My first goal was to identify where the issues in the reservation process were:

HTA: completed a simple task analysis to outline key steps where problems can be documented

Observation / Interview: Monitored a student (unfamiliar with the system) during a reservation, without offering help. A detailed transcript was made, and places where the student felt lost or frustrated were noted

 

Step 2 - Error Analysis

Next, I aimed to identify potential for error at each step

Cognitive Walk-through: A cog walk was completing, outlining higher-than-desired workload conditions for nearly all tasks that take place within the reservation application

SHERPA: completed a SHERPA error analysis, showing error probability and criticality for each step in the process.

SHERPA.png
 
Annotation 2020-04-25 235623.png

Step 3 - Redesign Recommendation

My recommendation was implementation of touch screen kiosks, with standalone software that would eliminate the need for the current program. Luckily, these units were already installed for commercial spaces, so the remainder of support research was conducted using these.

 

Step 4 - Justification

With cost being a major concern, I decided to complete a cost-benefit analysis, with the expected savings vs. the cost of implementation. This started with a KLM

KLM: Keystroke Level model was used to quantify the cost of:

  • wages spent on staff assisting students having issues (based on staff report, and weighed against hourly rate)

  • checking reservation lists

  • time spent on approvals and denials

  • time spent by students when making a reservation

Annotation 2020-04-26 000009.png
 
Annotation 2020-04-26.png

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Results of the KLM were weighed against the cost of 2 version of implementation, a single staff-controlled unit (with wages), or individual units for each room. These costs were supported with ROI estimates based on the wages saved

 

NASA - TLX - Lastly, TLX scores were collected from several students, asked to make a reservation on the current system and the touch screen systems. These scores show a massive reduction in workload, and frustration particularly, painting a clear picture of the impact on students.